About | Advertise | FAQ | Contact  | RSS Feed
Subscribe to this feed
ADVANCE for Nurse Practitioners RSS Feed
Search
Login | Sign Up

Current Issue

Subscriptions are FREE to Qualified Nurse Practitioners


Salary Survey Results

2007 Salary Survey Results: A Decade of Growth


Print ArticleEmail Article

Setting Sets the Rate
These averages reflect a wide range in individual NP compensation. From the beginning, salary has been a function of setting. Top earners in 2007 were the same as the top earners 10 years ago (Table 4). NPs employed in acute care settings headed the list: Emergency department NPs made an average of $95,157 last year; NPs in neonatal units earned $93,959; and nurse practitioners in other hospital and surgery settings grossed more than $86,000.


In contrast, NPs who earned the least in 2007 worked in educational settings: 12-month college health positions paid an average of $72,236; school NPs earned $71,512; and nurse practitioners who spent most of their time teaching made just $68,624 last year - 16% less than the average NP salary and 28% less than the average emergency department NP.

Fitzgerald chalks up the pay difference to high reimbursements for procedures: The highest paid NPs typically perform expensive procedures more often.

Ownership Aspirations
Right up there with acute care setting salaries are those being earned by NPs who have ventured out on their own. Although the top-earner rankings have shifted a bit over the decade, practice owners have consistently been among the top three. Last year, entrepreneurs brought home an average salary of $89,634.

The real story is that the ranks of practice owners are increasing - and quickly. Although their proportion might appear small (3% of survey respondents said they are owners) their percentage doubled between 2003 (1% of respondents) and 2005 (2%) and increased again by 50% over the past 2 years. And the lure of practice ownership continues to be enticing: In 2007, 11% of respondents said they intend to open their own health care-related practice in the next 5 years.

Suburbs were the most popular location for NP-owned practices (41%), and 12% were owned by men - even though men made up only 8% of all survey respondents. Most owners indicated that they had been nurse practitioners between 6 and 10 years (32%), followed by 3 to 5 years (23%). NPs with less than 2 years of experience in the role made up 6% of practice owners.

Family practices were the top choice for NPs who were owners (41%). Mental health practices came in second (15%).

We wondered at the popularity of mental health as a practice focus for NP owners, since only 4% of survey respondents overall said they practice in a psychiatric-mental health position. Terry Douglass is a pediatric nurse practitioner who owns a practice specializing in pediatric and adolescent mental health. The first explanation that comes to her mind is that mental health offices are easy to set up: They require no special equipment and can be staffed by an NP alone.

Aesthetics and skin care practices were also heavily represented among NP-owned practice settings, accounting for 3% of practices owned by nurse practitioners but only 0.5% of NP practice settings overall. High revenue possibilities for aesthetic procedures and zero reimbursement filings might account for the popularity of this practice choice.

Superspecialization
One important finding of the current survey is that NP subspecialties have proliferated, even since 2005. The 1997 survey included an employment setting category designated "specialty clinic or practice." Over the years, the setting choices have expanded in response to survey responses in previous years. By 2007, the choices included "cardiology clinic," "diabetes/endocrinology clinic," "HIV clinic" and "oncology clinic," among others.

Even with these focused answer choices, 24% of respondents listed "other" as their practice setting. These NPs almost always wrote in an even more specialized setting than the choices listed. For example, instead of choosing "pediatrics," one respondent wrote in "pediatric allergy and asthma clinic," another wrote "pediatric dermatology practice," another "pediatric neurology," and so on.

Fitzgerald says these responses reflect her own experience. At her lectures to NP audiences across the country, she finds that up to 60% of attendees practice in specialties or subspecialties. NP practice mirrors the larger move in U.S. health care away from treating populations (for example, family practice, pediatrics, adult care) to treating conditions (for example, asthma and allergy, cardiology, endocrinology), she explained.

Specialization can allow individual NPs to grow professionally and add to their knowledge, comments Tracy Klein, a family nurse practitioner who is the advanced practice consultant for the Oregon State Board of Nursing. But, she cautions, "NPs who are educated to practice only within a subspecialty will sooner or later run up against a regulatory or practice barrier that prohibits them from transferring and expanding their care."

Klein and Fitzgerald both predict that demand for subspecialty certification will increase among nurse practitioners and regulators. Klein believes that working without specialty credentialing keeps NPs under the thumb of physicians. "The inability to be autonomously credentialed under our own skill set with nursing-sensitive measures restricts us to supervision by other providers, generally MDs, as a proxy," she told ADVANCE.


2007 Salary Survey Results: A Decade of Growth

< Previous   |   Next >
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

Salary Survey Archives
 

Mike, after about ten years of engineering training resulting in a PhD, I do in fact make about what a NP or PA makes. But you should not be wanting NP/PA salaries to fall. You should want them to rise, but for our profession to have an even greater rise than theirs does. BOTH professions are severely underpaid.

Lauren, Tina, I'm sorry, but the bottom line is that the training of a PhD engineer is every bit as difficult as the training of an MD and just as long. I took my basic science ten years ago and scored 13 on the physical science portion of a practice MCAT with NO review of the physical sciences because the MCAT physical science questions are child's play in comparison with what is asked of engineers. Engineers not only have to understand science, they have to be able to do so both qualitatively and quantitatively using mathematical tools that make most MDs, NPs and PAs weak in the knees. In fact, to most engineering students, MCAT physical science exam is a joke.

Engineering PhDs just graduate with far less debt. I don't need the MD's large salary to service debt and malpractice insurance, though. As for responsibility for life and death- engineers bear even more responsibility over life and death than do you. That is why licensure standards for engineering are so tough. You don't see it or understand why, though, because you trust an engineer with your life every day when you walk inside a building, step on an airplane, or even drink water from the sink that has been treated by a plant run by engineers. Your health and safety is constantly in the hands of engineers, and because we are so good at what we do professionally because our training is so rigorous, you never even have to think about how much you do trust us with your life.

These comments are not made to belittle the work you do as a NP, only to tell you that you completely misunderstand the difficulty and intensity of the work required to prepare a PhD engineer. If salaries are truly based on the difficulty of the skills required by the profession to learn, engineering PhDs should be on the same level as an MD, and these people should be the highest paid groups of people in the country.

As for comments about family time being used for study to get an NP, do you even realize how long many engineering PhDs delay the start of a family? I'm 28 and have never had a girlfriend! Don't complain to me about your education taking up family time- YOU HAVE ONE!




Mark November 15, 2009



To Mike the engineer,
I do hope you stubble upon this page again. I can't help but feel sorry for you. You or family members have obviously never been ill or had care delivered by a NP. I challenge you to spend one day in a local hospital and watch what RNs do at the bedside. NPs do not provide bedside care but this is because we have advanced training and we are diagnosing and treating patients. However, to make to this point, we have to be RNs first with a bachelors degree and then go on to get a masters to become a NP. So when you talk about years of education, you don't have that much on us. Also, an engineer does not balance life and death in his or her hands. You have to take into consideration the kind of work we do. You walk into our offices, practices, and hospitals and expect us to tell you exactly what is wrong with you and fix it in the smallest amount of time possible. Not only do we try to meet all of your health needs, we also provide education to you and your family, spend time with your family as they deal with the stress of your illness, and as a NP, provide all of this care at a reduced rate than a physician. Lastly, if you are not satisfied with your salary, which from what I hear in the area that I live, engineers tend to do very well, do something else. Don't use your dissatisfaction of your salary to try and bring down health care workers who do some of the greatest, most compassionate care in the country.


Lauren ,  RN, BSN, FNP/MSN studentSeptember 27, 2009
TN



As a new NP of approx 6 months i have enjoyed my new role However i still work as a staff nurse as my salary as a staff nurse is at least 20-30 thousand more than as an NP. There is something very wrong with a system that pays more money to less educated nurses with less responsibity. New grads are manking more than NP's. this is a system with multiple problems where new grads are paid more than 30 yr nurses with advanced degrees. There should be an ability to advance salaries as experience and responsibity increases. NO NP should make less money than new nurses. We the community of NP's need to show group support and educated the public on what we do and why we are worth more than a new grad out of nursing school. We need to demand pay equal to our experties, education and experience.

marla schlesinger,  NP,  SubacuteSeptember 16, 2009
tarzana, CA



Read all comments (75) >>


     

Email: *

Email, first name, comment and security code are required fields; all other fields are optional. With the exception of email, any information you provide will be displayed with your comment.

First * Last
Name:
Title Field Facility
Work:
City State
Location:

Comments: *
To prevent comment spam, please type the code you see below into the code field before submitting your comment. If you cannot read the numbers in the below image, reload the page to generate a new one.

Captcha
Enter the security code below: *

Fields marked with an * are required.

 

Search Jobs

Zip

Go