About | Advertise | FAQ | Contact  | RSS Feed
Subscribe to this feed
ADVANCE for Nurse Practitioners RSS Feed
Search
Login | Sign Up

Current Issue

Subscriptions are FREE to Qualified Nurse Practitioners


Salary Survey Results

2007 Salary Survey Results: A Decade of Growth

Print ArticleEmail Article

ADVANCE is currently collecting data for the 2009 National Salary and Workplace Survey of Nurse Practitioners. Nurse practitioners, fill out the new survey here.


Printer-Friendly PDF


If you happen to have a copy of ADVANCE for Nurse Practitioners from the end of 1997 lying around, take a look at the salary survey questionnaire.

OK, we'll summarize it for you.

Ten years ago, the first National Salary Survey of Nurse Practitioners included only half the number of questions contained in our 2007 survey. Besides neglecting to ask for an e-mail address (how many NPs used e-mail in 1997?), it mentioned nothing about education, on-call pay or intent to own. Retail clinics and aesthetics practices weren't even on the radar.

The National Salary and Workplace Survey of Nurse Practitioners has changed along with the profession. Responses to the survey have nearly tripled, from a respectable 2,150 faxed or mailed responses in 1997 to 6,162 this year. Below you'll find our analysis of NP compensation, prescribing habits, office hierarchy, opportunity perceptions and job satisfaction.

The tables accompanying this article compare NP pay over time and across master's-level professions. They lay out salaries by practice setting, experience, education and gender. Geographic differences are reflected in tables that indicate pay rates by state and patient population setting. Average salaries for select cities are included to illustrate that compensation can vary even across cities within the same state. Table 11 (click here) reproduces the original questionnaire with the addition of the percentage of responses for each answer choice; monetary values indicate the average of all responses.

The Big Payoff
Survey data show that the average nurse practitioner salary rose 8.8% over the past 2 years, from $74,812 in 2005 to $81,397 in 2007. The increase is an impressive 55% over the decade (Table 1). For the sake of comparison, physician assistant salaries increased by 35% over the same period, according to numbers available online from the American Academy of Physician Assistants.

These big pay gains reflect big public relations gains, says Margaret Fitzgerald, NP, president of Fitzgerald Health Education Associates. "We have made great headway in establishing ourselves in the marketplace, from marginalized providers who practiced in relative anonymity to a professional group that is increasingly being recognized for our contributions to health care," Fitzgerald told ADVANCE.

Jill Olmstead, NP, president-elect of the California Association for Nurse Practitioners, seconds Fitzgerald. "An 8.8% wage increase reflects a combination of nurse practitioners' capabilities combined with their overall importance to the health care system," she said.

NPs who worked part time made headway, too. The average part-time hourly wage for NPs in 2007 was $40.32, a 9.5% increase from the 2005 rate (Table 2). And NP salaries continued to compare favorably with those of other professionals with master's degrees (Table 3).




2007 Salary Survey Results: A Decade of Growth

 Next >
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

Salary Survey Archives
 

Mark, the arrogant engineer,

You’re right, engineers do make our planes and water safe; however, it takes many engineers and workers months to build a plane or building. It takes only one nurse, NP, PA, or MD to save a life in a matter of seconds. I feel bad for someone who is so wrapped up in their work that they are unable to appreciate the work of others. Next time you are in the hospital and at your most vulnerable point, try to appreciate the healthcare workers that are fighting to save your life.


Andrew ,  RN, BSNNovember 28, 2009



The guy with the PhD in engineering has no idea what he is talking about when he said medical school is easier than having a PhD. That might be true for some engineering schools.However, you fail to understand there is an engineering school in every single corner in the United States. I was an engineering student and it it not that difficult the way you portrayed it. To get into medical school you have to be the best of the best. There is no competition to get into engineering school. Someone can get a PhD in engineering in crappy school and you dont have to be that good to get it. However, to be a physician in the US...trust me: you have to be better than average. Some enginering schools are hard. However, there are a lot of them that are not up to standard and getting a Phd on them is not quite difficult.

Max  Alexandre,  RNNovember 28, 2009
Miami, FL



Mike, after about ten years of engineering training resulting in a PhD, I do in fact make about what a NP or PA makes. But you should not be wanting NP/PA salaries to fall. You should want them to rise, but for our profession to have an even greater rise than theirs does. BOTH professions are severely underpaid.

Lauren, Tina, I'm sorry, but the bottom line is that the training of a PhD engineer is every bit as difficult as the training of an MD and just as long. I took my basic science ten years ago and scored 13 on the physical science portion of a practice MCAT with NO review of the physical sciences because the MCAT physical science questions are child's play in comparison with what is asked of engineers. Engineers not only have to understand science, they have to be able to do so both qualitatively and quantitatively using mathematical tools that make most MDs, NPs and PAs weak in the knees. In fact, to most engineering students, MCAT physical science exam is a joke.

Engineering PhDs just graduate with far less debt. I don't need the MD's large salary to service debt and malpractice insurance, though. As for responsibility for life and death- engineers bear even more responsibility over life and death than do you. That is why licensure standards for engineering are so tough. You don't see it or understand why, though, because you trust an engineer with your life every day when you walk inside a building, step on an airplane, or even drink water from the sink that has been treated by a plant run by engineers. Your health and safety is constantly in the hands of engineers, and because we are so good at what we do professionally because our training is so rigorous, you never even have to think about how much you do trust us with your life.

These comments are not made to belittle the work you do as a NP, only to tell you that you completely misunderstand the difficulty and intensity of the work required to prepare a PhD engineer. If salaries are truly based on the difficulty of the skills required by the profession to learn, engineering PhDs should be on the same level as an MD, and these people should be the highest paid groups of people in the country.

As for comments about family time being used for study to get an NP, do you even realize how long many engineering PhDs delay the start of a family? I'm 28 and have never had a girlfriend! Don't complain to me about your education taking up family time- YOU HAVE ONE!




Mark November 15, 2009



Read all comments (77) >>


     

Email: *

Email, first name, comment and security code are required fields; all other fields are optional. With the exception of email, any information you provide will be displayed with your comment.

First * Last
Name:
Title Field Facility
Work:
City State
Location:

Comments: *
To prevent comment spam, please type the code you see below into the code field before submitting your comment. If you cannot read the numbers in the below image, reload the page to generate a new one.

Captcha
Enter the security code below: *

Fields marked with an * are required.

 

Search Jobs

Zip

Go